tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9094742788006644220.post6685422781085289317..comments2010-01-12T11:00:23.540-08:00Mike Brownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9094742788006644220.post-69038439812125551692009-08-22T08:32:38.058-07:002009-08-22T08:32:38.058-07:00I was researching about this so-call end of the world theory about this fake planet, I am very pleased that I am not the only one who thinking it is a load of rubbish. We must always challenge this pseudo-science like this fake theory which not old, it was dreamed up by some sci-fi writer in the 1960&#39;s to sell books. And to Senmut &amp; Don&#39;t Be Evil, you are so wrong as there is no evidence of your theories, it just junk science &amp; I would as far to say that more of these theories have only appeared in the last hundred year,at the most, mostly from the 1950&#39;s onwards.Bill Wyattnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9094742788006644220.post-51904782770728406692008-03-12T07:20:00.000-07:002008-03-12T07:20:00.000-07:00article was on space.com,...Pavel SmutnyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9094742788006644220.post-8629327610430419932008-03-12T07:13:00.000-07:002008-03-12T07:13:00.000-07:00There is again gravity anomaly (not only Pioneers or Voyagers have it) in orbits of NEO satellites, what is exactly 1/million of Earth;s gravity on geostationary orbit.<BR/>This gr. force so is equal to force from X, if X is 2 bil. km from us and have mass 20MJup, what is in coincidence from my search results,..<BR/>Mike, you again forgot to answer my questions. Why are all planetoids behind Pluto, Pluto inclusive close to their perihelias, aphelias,...isn't it due to projection of opposite motions of Sun with inner planets to arriving X to its perihelia? Isn't it so unimportant to you?????!!!!! not worthy to answer?????!!!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9094742788006644220.post-43774346428653230922008-02-14T13:52:00.000-08:002008-02-14T13:52:00.000-08:00What about creationism?Don't Be Evilhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02035440442140527699noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9094742788006644220.post-79282645381375941762008-02-04T02:35:00.000-08:002008-02-04T02:35:00.000-08:00Mike, you forgot one scientific approach,- that is historical. If people had seen some object on sky, they had described that's object's path on sky, they had written, drawn it even on astromap, there were effects on Earth, water masses and if those effects are even written in sediments, in ice core- can be dated and even are in coincidence with those paper, stone artefacts, so it is science, not pseudoscience!!!senmuthamops1.szm.sknoreply@blogger.com